[ Welcome to theday.com ]
Monday, Jan 26, 2009
Fair
26 degrees F
  Get a great rate for subscribing today.Register @ TheDay.comAdvertising InformationText Alerts, Sign Up Now! My Shopping Cart0 items | $0.00
 Classifieds
 CTcars
 Jobs
 Real Estate
 Pets
 Business Directory
 Entertainment »
 Calendar
 Food & Dining
 Horoscopes
 Movies
 Music
 Tourism
 TV
 Interactive
 Blogs
 Discussions
 Forums
 Sudoku Classic
 Jigsaw Puzzle
 Crossword
 Photo Gallery
 Slide Show
 News
 Anniversaries
 Auto
 Births
 Business
 Beliefs
 Columns
 Community
 Corrections
 Court, Fire & Police
 Education
 Engagements
 Features
 Health, Sci/Tech
 Military
 Nation/World
 Obituaries
 Politics
 Real Estate
 Region
 Spanish News
 Special Reports
 State News
 Weather
 Weddings
 Opinion
 Editorial
 Letters
 Sports »
 Auto Racing
 Local Sports
 High School
 UConn
 College
 CT Defenders
 CT Sun
 Professional Sports
 Publications
 Body & More
 Bridal Guide
 Grace Magazine
 Spaces
 Menu Guide
 Mystic Country
 Day Saver
 Sound & Country
 Go Westerly
 Services
 Advertise
 Customer Service
 FAQs
 Feedback
 Help & How To ...
 Photo Reprints
 Printing Services
 Subscribe
 Register
 Newspaper
 About The Day
 Contact Us
 Day Profiles
 http://www.theday.com/theday/day_jobs.aspx
 Newspaper In
 Education
 Office Locations
 Affiliates
 News Channel 8
 Parade Magazine
 Shore Publishing
Home »Region »Region News
Avery Point Professor Studies World Being Altered By Climate Change
Over 25 years, he has seen coral in tropical waters die off as ocean warms
By Judy Benson     Published on 1/25/2009
header
  Buy Photo Enlarge this Image By Sean D. Elliot
Peter Auster, an associate professor at UConn's Avery Point campus, talks to a student in Auster's lab. He is studying the possible effects of global climate change on marine life.
Print this article. Print This Bookmark and Share
E-mail link to the article Send Letter E-mail link to the article Send Correction


Groton - Peter Auster explored the coral reefs off Bonaire island in the Netherlands Antilles for the first time in 1982, when he was in his mid-20s and at the start of his career as a marine scientist.

He's been returning with his scuba gear periodically ever since, both for his ongoing research and on his own time during vacations from his post at the University of Connecticut's Avery Point campus.

A quarter-century is a significant span in a person's career, but not in the gradual time frames in which complex organisms like corals and reef fishes have evolved and changed - at least it's not supposed to be. But over those years, the 52-year-old associate professor, whose research focuses on reef fishes, fish behavior and fisheries management and related areas, has witnessed a disturbing transformation of the Bonaire reefs.

CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE OCEANS

  • Mean sea surface temperatures have increased about one degree Fahrenheit in the last 100 years, particularly since the 1950s.
  • Some areas of the ocean are becoming saltier, while others are freshening.
  • Sea level has risen 7 inches over the last 100 years, and the rate has accelerated in the last 15 years. The trend is expected to continue well past 2100.
  • Ocean acidification has caused the pH levels of the ocean to decrease by 0.1 unit in the last 250 years. The levels are expected to decline by 0.5 unit by 2100.
  • Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have risen 35 percent in the last 200 years. The concentration is the highest it has been in the last 650,000 years.
  • Changes in oxygen levels and water circulation patterns also have been observed in the world's oceans.Changes in ranges and abundance of algae, plankton, zooplankton and fish have been observed.
  • ”Last June when I went there, it was mostly dead coral, about 80 percent,” said Auster, showing photographs on his computer comparing the reef today with the one 25 years ago. “In 1982, there was 90 percent coral cover.”

    In the earlier photo, the underwater world is lush with staghorn corals. The recent one shows a sea floor mostly barren except for a few pieces of brain coral. Various localized forces are likely contributing culprits in the dramatic change, from nearby coastal development and pollution to hurricanes and damage from fishing vessels. But increasingly at this reef and others in seas both tropical and temperate, a global phenomenon is also exacting its toll: climate change.

    ”Will they recover?” Auster asked, referring to the dead and degraded coral reefs worldwide, which are vital to the health of fish populations and other marine life.

    Climate change, he said, “hasn't made the other problems I work with go away,” but over the last five years the effects of climate change are becoming more pronounced in the marine environments he studies.

    ”It's one big uncontrolled experiment,” he said.

    The effects of climate change, caused mainly by carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and other industrial activities, are evident in oceans and marine ecosystems worldwide in measurable ways that can be more obvious than changes on land.

    In a 2008 report on the state of coral reefs, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration notes that the poor health of many reefs is tied to the larger changes in the ocean and coastal environments from global warming.

    In the warming planet, sea levels and water temperatures are rising, as glaciers melt and warmer water expands. Corals, notes Auster, live at the edge of their tolerance levels for water depth - they need to be close enough to the surface for sufficient sunlight to penetrate - and temperature. When conditions aren't right, corals are more susceptible to diseases such as coral bleaching, which threatens reef survival.

    ”Bleaching events have become more frequent and longer,” said Auster.

    As the NOAA report notes, the very chemistry of the world's oceans has been altered, and how the marine life that depends on the sea is being affected isn't fully known. Some creatures will thrive in the new environment, but many more, particularly more complex species, may not be able to adapt quickly enough.

    Much of the carbon dioxide released into the air since the start of the Industrial Revolution has ended up in the sea. There, it mixes with water and forms carbonic acid. Today ocean surface water is estimated to be 30 percent more acidic than 250 years ago, according to a November report by Oceana, an international ocean conservation group, and is expected to be 100 percent more acidic by the end of the century if current trends continue.

    This, in turn, threatens coral growth.

    ”Corals…” the NOAA report notes, “are able to calcify their skeletal structures from sea water because of particular chemical properties. Continued increases in CO2 … may prevent coral reef growth altogether.” Acidification is expected to have a similar effect on shellfish.

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a U.N. scientists' group that synthesizes research from throughout the world, in a 2007 report called coral reefs among the “most vulnerable” of all the world's ecosystems due to global warming. Salt marshes and mangroves, also vital to fish and other marine life, are others.

    ”The oceans are acidifying faster than we had predicted, and there are widespread effects in the marine environment,” said Auster.

    When he researches issues specific to fish and fisheries, he is also seeing the effects of climate change in combination with other factors like overfishing and pollution.

    Just offshore from the Avery Point campus in Long Island Sound, for example, data from trawl surveys shows the mix of fish species is changing, Auster notes. Spotted hake and other species more prevalent in southern waters are increasing, while bluefish and others that favor colder waters are declining.

    The 2007 report from the I.P.C.C., the group that won the Nobel Peace Prize that year for its climate change research, said, “local extinctions of particular fish are expected …” particularly in species like salmon and sturgeon that spend parts of their lives in fresh and salt water. Both are found in the Sound.

    Auster, who grew up in Middletown and now lives in Chester, took up scuba diving as a teenager. For a time he thought about becoming an astronaut, but instead settled on a career as a marine scientist.

    ”I wanted to study life,” he said, “and there's life all around you in the ocean.”

    The condition of the ecosystems he has spent his career studying does get discouraging at times, he admits, and the threats posed by climate change at times seem unstoppable.

    ”But it's not hopeless,” he said.

    His work through Avery Point and the other marine organizations he is part of may increase understanding of how corals and fishes are being affected by climate change. But ultimately, he said, scientists won't be the ones driving any response. Auster is a member of international fisheries management groups, is on the advisory council of the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary off the Massachusetts coast and in the midst of a three-year research project there, and is the research director of the National Undersea Research Center at Avery Point.

    ”It's easy to just say we need more studies,” he said. “But at this point, we know we're in trouble. We know enough” to know what's needed: prompt and widespread actions to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change already being seen.

    ”Our response will be based on our values and ethics and the desire for the future we want to see,” he said. “We need the political and social will to do it. We know the direction we need to move.”


    Regional
    R E A D E R'S C O M M E N T S
    Posted - 1/26/2009 9:45:57 AM
    How many of you global warming deniers are also creationists? I suspect it is probably close to 99% of you. Instead of listening to the few fringe people with scientific training who tell you what you want to hear, how about listening to the vast majority of scientists who are convinced that global warming is a real danger? The use of anecdotal evidence (i.e. "it is cold outside today, thus the scientists must be wrong") is not a particularly intelligent way to assess the situation. It would be nice if you would question your own religious beliefs as much as you question reality (i.e. science). It is unfortunate that many people treat science as if it is a competing ideology to their religious views; it is not - rather, it is a self-correcting process (via constant and highly competitive peer-review) designed to come up with models of how our underlying reality works. When evidence is found that a commonly held understanding is insufficient or wrong, the scientific method aims to correct deficiencies. For example, classical Newtonian physics was thought to explain everything for a few hundred years; in the early 20th century, Einstein and others found it insufficient to describe extreme situations, and thus we now have relativity for the really the massive and/or fast and quantum mechanics for the really small. Instead of listening to Fox News and Bill O'Reilly, you may want to try reading Scientific American.
    Reality-Based Citizen
    Waterford, CT
    - 1/26/2009 9:50:14 AM
    Posted - 1/26/2009 7:18:14 AM
    When I used to post my name and company I told the public of it for years. Senator Dodd and Lieberman did nothing. The state of CT felt it better to give a $10,000 grants to large corporations instead of a small startup. Now my company is located in the EU after having the USA dumping on it. It is patented in 43 countries, tested by several independent labs and prototypes are available for viewing in Vienna. 7 years ago, when we announced it to the world, there was little fanfare. People were more interested in "flipping" that house or installing a $30,000 bathroom. I beat my head against the wall for 7 years and no more. Germany, the Netherlands Denmark, Spain and Portugal are now in a bidding war for us to produce them in their country. Sorry America, it is people like "William, watcher and dollar" are the reason for this. Oil is NOT going to last forever but these morons will be "making oil" when it runs out, so they don't care. They are probably driving a V8 engine, attend church and are against abortion. If you want to read about this technology you will have to get a foreign newspaper for it will be years before I allow distribution in the USA. The world DOES extend beyond your little world people. Grow a garden, buy local, actually walk the 2 blocks to the store to get your cigarettes... 2/3 of Americans are overweight and 1/4 of the children obese. The problem is American have become lazy and is too why I am leaving before the country falls into further disrepair. PS. The Day was told several times of this technology but they also didn't want to do a story in it... Sorry Joe and Ted! I guess they were more concerned about some fluff story?!
    INdependent Observer
    New London County
    - 1/26/2009 7:26:33 AM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 4:20:48 PM
    If and when scientists separate the natural from the man made which will be impossible to do lets talk, otherwise man made global warming is bunk.
    BW
    NL
    - 1/25/2009 7:10:15 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 4:20:10 PM
    If and when scientists separate the natural from the man made which will be impossible to do lets talk, otherwise man made global warming is bunk.
    BW
    NL
    - 1/25/2009 7:13:29 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 4:16:04 PM
    Imagine the power saved if everyone turned off their TV. With digital TV coming down the pike in the near future and the government giving coupons for digital TV converters has anyone considered the millions of digital converters being plugged in to support this conversion. If each converter consumes as little as 10 watts of energy and it is estimated that 30 million will need converters that's 300mega watts of energy added to the system all just to watch the stupid TV.
    BW
    NL
    - 1/25/2009 7:15:16 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 2:18:48 PM
    To Independent Observer: Describe or identify the name of the technology and how it works.. Be a part of the solution, not the problem.
    Robert Fromer
    Windsor
    - 1/25/2009 7:18:33 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 2:15:23 PM
    Dr. Auster: You have neglected three small but substantive and substantial details - the signficant depletion of fossil fuels within 20 years makes all current efforts to control climate change relatively pointless. Hisrtorically, all economic growth and societies conform to the Bell curve and global societies will not change their classical economic mindset of growth - overpopulation and overconsumption.
    Robert Fromer
    Windsor
    - 1/25/2009 7:18:08 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 2:04:41 PM
    Well, I don't know how things are in CT but I can assure it isn't only coral reef ecosystem collapsing, all the trees, every species, around my home in NJ is dying. Soils have been depleted by acid rain which weakens trees, and overall drier and warmer climate is killing them. Denier trolls are so tedious. You don't have to believe the FACTUAL science if you don't want - just try going outside and LOOKING at the pine trees that are shedding their needles. Then think about all the birds and other plants and animals that depend on trees that are going to perish. And then, think about the power outages from fallen trees, and wildfires, and the expense of cutting them down in your yard. Think this can't happen here? http://www.agweekly.com/articles/2009/01/24/news/ag_news/news31.txtJust wait.Thank you Dr. Auster for your research, reason, and leaving yourself open to the attacks by fools.
    Gail Zawacki
    Oldwick, NJ
    - 1/25/2009 7:17:03 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 12:25:06 PM
    Some people will never be convinced this is a problem based on evidence and reason but here are a few things to consider: 1. The regional highs and lows fit within the predicted global scale responses of climate models. We have seen these patterns before in the recent past and the planet overall continues on the warming trend. We need to look beyond our front door.2. If this were really a conspiracy then any LEGITIMATE scientist would make a huge name for themselves by exposing it. Where are they?3. All hypotheses are testable and falsifiable. While the uncertainty is extremely low at this point in regards to the human influence on warming and there are well accepted predictions that result in catastrophic effects across the globe, I cannot discount that there is always an extremely small chance that the predictions could be wrong to some extent (although many predictions related to melting and ocean acidification are turning out to be too conservative to date). In the end, this is not some arcane intellectual debate. It has implications for the global environment, the goods and servicies we all derive from nature, and the future structure and function of societies across the globe. As the Nation with the greatest single impact on this problem, and assuming we are right in our estimates but ignore the predictions, who wants to tell their grandchildren we sat around and did nothing?
    Peter Auster
    Chester, CT
    - 1/25/2009 1:33:31 PM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 10:47:48 AM
    global warming being caused by the actions of hmans is a myth.every 13 to 15 thousand years thie planet goes through cycles of climate change.global warming happens to some degree just before a cooldown" ice age"begins.this has been going on for as long as the earth has had weather.people need to accept that and stop assigning blame.while claning up greenhouse gas emissions is a good idea theses emissions did not cause the warming trend.study your history and you will find the truth in the fossil recordsnext week i may share how to fix the ozone layer
    watcher
    norwich ct
    - 1/25/2009 11:08:31 AM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 7:57:20 AM
    Yes, certainly, the earth is warming ... and it's man's fault. Just step outside this morning - six degrees; you'll need to strip down to your shorts it's so warm. This winter's frequent snowfalls and single-digit/sub-zero temperatures above the Mason Dixon Line are proof positive that the earth is, in fact, warming, right? Wondering if Professor Auster was among the same group of esteemed scientists who in the 1970s and 80s warned of the second coming of a catastrophic Ice Age? It's all good for making headlines and scaring kids, but in 30 years Avery Point and other shoreline communities will NOT be underwater as some predict, and we'll be looking back in conversation to muse: "Remember all those guys who said the earth was warming and the polar ice cap was melting? Ha, ha, ha!"
    Dollar Bill
    Waterford
    - 1/25/2009 8:47:17 AM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 6:41:22 AM
    98% of this is B.S. The earth has been going through climate change since it’s inception. The sun, and solar winds and storms have the most effect on climate change, which is a natural process. Man’s effect is a drop in the bucket. When a volcano erupts, or earthquakes release millions of tons of methane or CO2, they do so in vast amounts that would take man a century to release. This whole thing is nothing more than a gimmick to employ people who are creating an empire for themselves, like Al Gore. The U.N. is involved because all the Countries who just can’t compete with us, would rather take us down a few pegs using any method they can. Global warming is a scam, a political scam. There are just as many, and more getting on board, saying just the opposite is happening, global cooling. So which is it? How much is just natural and how much is man-made?
    William Morey
    Niantic, CT
    - 1/25/2009 8:45:11 AM
    Posted - 1/25/2009 6:20:11 AM
    There is a technology that could have eliminated 30% of this countries electric demand but the politicians, bankers and investors didn't want to see it. It is now being developed in an EU country and should be on their shelves in the next year. Imagine not paying the electric bill for heating your water or cooling your food? The millions of tons of CO@ that could have been eliminated from our skies will still be produced for the oil/energy industry has deep pockets and doesn't care about the environment. How do I know about this technology? I helped develop it in 2001. It works great, using the suns heat instead of fossil fuel. How many refrigerators are running this morning when it is 6 degrees outside? Fortunately members of the EU are aware of the damage we are causing to the environment and ARE taking steps to eliminate the dependency on oil. This country is stuck on the oil tit and the excuses for driving that huge SUV are mindnumbing. Could it be you are too lazy or fat to walk somewhere? The average American walks less that 1/2 a mile a day and is overweight. But Reagan killed the Presidential physical fitness program and replaced it with "just say no"... we see how that worked sooooo well!
    Independent Observer
    New London County
    - 1/25/2009 8:46:29 AM
    POST COMMENT
    ( Some comments posted to theday.com could be reprinted in The Day, but only if the author includes his or her full name and town.)
    Name
    Your E-mail Address:  (Your e-mail will not be displayed online)
    City, State
    Message
    Click here to access the Days Epaper
    Access the Day's E-Edition

    Print Advertisers
    Today's Print Ads
    Web Advertisers

    For the best site experience, please use a non-beta version of Internet Explorer 6+, set the screen resolution to 1024x768, and enable JavaScript and Cookies. For additional enhancements, install Macromedia Flash, Adobe Acrobat, Windows Media Player, Apple QuickTime, and Real Player
    TheDay.com
    Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us at 1 (860) 442-2200  |  New London, CT  |  © 1998-2009 The Day Publishing Co.
    104